Obligatory "ignore this space" : https://sacoronavirus.co.za

Do you want me to say 'technological restriction'?

They talk about reinventing the wheel: so let's start there, because obviously (obviously (obviously)) we shall not be doing so if there is to be a single technological restriction. Which unit would you like to use?

While you think of that, I'm going to 'not reinvent the wheel' - this isn't hard, but you might get the idea that I'm sitting on my thumbs. And that's a matter of multitasking.

Protocols took a knock on the head, didn't they?

If you're going to show off your Mountain Man, I'll show you a pair of shoes. We like to say the protocols got knocked on the head by aliens from outer space.

I'm not one of those who finds a warm toilet seat 'gross' or uncomfortable, and by all means tell me that I therefore have a fetish. On the matter of keeping what is as good as a doorstop warm, should I worry who's in whose lap? Bouncing up and down? I want to see the footage, but now we need to talk about encryption.

That--and I don't feel like repeating the last word of the last paragraph just to keep this one self-contained--is something I came to think I understood, but now that I don't have my notes with me, I come to think I don't have the right to say that.

Should I sneek a peek from my Gitstry?

A complementary key pair requires you to know where all the copies of a thing is. I like to see that suggestions can be patient: shall I help to 'sort your network out' with a crying baby in the background?

Noises that are just as annoying as crying can come from what is not a baby. Are you going to call me ageist if I assume that we're only concerning ourselves about what can feed itself and fetch its own food?

We most certainly cannot do without evidence that choice is being exercised.

I'm afraid the bouncing's going to have to be stopped for the sake of an old friend. As it seems I need to prove to you that independence is worth forgoing any pleasure on earth, I must start from--and this really does depress me--a and b. If there's two directions--sick, isn't it--we'll be asked if that's a technological restriction.

No, this is.

Now, as you can see the difference between given and what 'assume' ultimately comes down to, I would like to christen what is an intersection in one direction only. We might look at a steel gate that's been place right through the middle of a road: this, at least, we know had nothing to do with AIDS. But simply by mentioning a virus I've tainted the potential of the description to bring forth something good.

And it doesn't make any sense to try to 'recover' when I can just shove this in your face and start a new one, does it?

••
• 1.51472/9